Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ?

From: Hornyak Laszlo <kocka(at)tigrasoft(dot)hu>
To: Vasilis Ventirozos <vendi(at)cosmoline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ?
Date: 2003-09-08 08:32:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0309081024350.7376-100000@tiger.tigrasoft.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin


Could you give more detailed information?
What does explain say?

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Vasilis Ventirozos wrote:

> Hi all, i work in a telco and i have huge ammount of data, (50 million)
> but i see a lack of performance at huge tables with postgres,
> are 50 million rows the "limit" of postgres ? (with a good performance)
> i am waiting for 2004 2 billion records so i have to do something.
> Does anyone have a huge database to ask him some issues ?
>
> my hardware is good ,my indexes are good plz dont answer me something like use
> vacuum :)
>
>
>
> The Joy of Index
>
> Vasilis Ventirozos
> --------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vasilis Ventirozos 2003-09-08 08:56:15 Re: Are 50 million rows a problem for postgres ?
Previous Message Giannis Vrentzos 2003-09-08 08:12:57 Re: Slackware