From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Childs <Blue(dot)Dragon(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta |
Date: | 2003-08-15 06:05:17 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0308151601380.27005-100000@linuxworld.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> That really needs to be rewritten to do a single check over the table
> rather than running the constraint for every row. I keep meaning to get
> around to it and never actually do. :( I'm not sure that in practice
> you'll get a better plan at restore time depending on what the default
> statistics give you.
Perhaps it would be easier to allow SKIP VALIDATION (or something) with
ALTER TABLE ADD .... which can set FkConstraint->skip_validation. If we're
just handling pg_dump output, then presumably the data is already
validated. On the other handle, it might encourage users to bypass FKs
when they feel like it...
Thanks,
Gavin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-08-15 06:12:01 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-08-15 05:46:25 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-08-15 06:12:01 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-08-15 05:46:25 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta |