Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>, PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-13 02:07:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0308131200290.31894-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> I think Gavin Sherry is working on this. I am CC'ing him.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes I am working on this. I am about 50% of the way through the patch but
have been held up with other work. For those who are interested, it
basically allow:

1) creation of different 'storage' locations. Tables and indexes can be
created in different storage locations. Storage locations can also be
assigned to schemas and databases. Tables and indexes will default to the
schema storage location if STORAGE 'store name' is not provided to CREATE
.... This will cascade to the default database storage location if
the schema was not created with STORAGE 'store name'.

2) the patch will allow different storage locations to have different
rand_cost parameters passed to the planner.

3) the patch *will not* address issues concerning quotas, resource
management, WAL/clog, temp or sort spaces.

Will keep everyone posted if/when I finish.

Thanks,

Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2003-08-13 03:30:33 Re: Perfomance Tuning
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-13 01:53:24 Re: Filesystems WAS: Perfomance Tuning