Re: pgstats_initstats() cost

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgstats_initstats() cost
Date: 2003-08-12 12:34:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0308122231140.9181-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:

> > world. It just seemed interesting that the numbers were three times slower
> > than other databases I ran it on. Here is the script which generates the
>
> You were comparing against databases with similar safety nets to
> guarantee against dataloss?

I am in the process of reading through the logging/versioning code of them
and the others definately do. My main interest is in determining how to
reduce the cost of pgstats_initstats().

Thanks,

Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-12 13:19:00 Re: Oversight?
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-08-12 12:29:35 Re: pgstats_initstats() cost