| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |
| Date: | 2003-07-23 00:28:33 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0307231027001.817-100000@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:13:34AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > "If you tried PostgreSQL before, and it wasn't quite fast enough,
> > > and you went with Oracle, it's time to re-evaluate," suggests Rod
> >
> > Can I suggest you use "something else" instead of "Oracle"? I know
> > it's weasely, but Oracle has lawyers and they're not afraid to use
> > them.
>
> How could Oracle sue us for claiming to be as good or faster? MySQL does
> this all the time, and I don't see that it's landed them in any legal hot
> water.
Its not a fair statement and it is not rigorously proven. As such, I'd go
for a more generalised statement.
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-07-23 01:43:50 | Re: New Poll @ Codewalkers |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-22 23:18:24 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |