| From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Damn triggers and NEW |
| Date: | 2003-06-17 10:56:28 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0306171155010.5417-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Joe Conway wrote:
> Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> > I'd appreciate some pointers on this as it appears new/old can't be used in an
> > execute statement in triggers but that sounds completely wrong.
> >
>
> I've tried this before, and unfortunately I think that statement is
> currently true. I dug in to it one day and it didn't look too easy to
> fix either (no big surprise there, otherwise someone probably would have
> already fixed it ;-))
>
> I ended up concluding that, short of a patch to the backend, a C code
> trigger would be needed. You might be able to do something with pltcl or
> one of the other PLs though.
Ok, thanks Joe. That's what I was thinking I might have to do, a C code
version that is.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno BAGUETTE | 2003-06-17 11:21:08 | RE : full featured alter table? |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2003-06-17 10:54:11 | Re: Sort memory not being released |