Re: lo_copy()

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > I wonder if anyone has any comments on this [psuedo] code:
>
> > new loid := SELECT lo_creat(131072 + 262144);
>
> > UPDATE pg_largeobject SET
> > data = (SELECT data
> > FROM pg_largeobject
> > WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno = 0)
> > WHERE loid = <new loid> AND pageno = 0;
>
> > INSERT INTO pg_largeobject
> > (loid, pageno, data)
> > (SELECT <new loid>, pageno, data
> > FROM pg_largeobject
> > WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno > 0
> > );
>
> I believe this will work, but it requires superuser privileges to
> scribble on pg_largeobject directly. Probably would be better to go
> through the gruntwork of creating a fully supported lo_copy() operation.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Thanks Tom, I was just a little worried that the page 0 record contained some
housekeeping type data that really shouldn't be copied from another page
0.

I noticed the scribbling on pg_largeobject priviledge and had created the
function with '...INVOKE AS DEFINER...' with a switch into superuser just for
that function's definition. Apart from making it more suitable for inclusion in
the main distribution, and possibly speed, I'm not sure what recoding in C
gives me given that I'm happy at the moment to do it this way. I may look into
a C version for submision later.

--
Nigel J. Andrews