From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RC1? |
Date: | 2002-11-13 17:04:30 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0211131659380.14887-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > FWIW, gmake check and gmake bigcheck pass on:
> > FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE #3: Thu Feb 3 23:48:56 GMT 2000
>
> > with the expection of:
> > [snipped]
> > in the float8 test.
>
> Okay, looks like we need to use float8-fp-exception.out on your
> platform. This is a bit surprising since resultmap presently shows
>
> float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero
>
> How shall we distinguish your version of freebsd from the ones that
> need the other comparison file?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Is it necessary, I mean really necessary to distinguish this system? It's quite
an old installation [that ain't broke so I ain't fixed it] and the difference
is only the error message. I hadn't even looked to see if there was a better
expected output file, just accepted it as a normal, acceptable variation in
the regression tests.
I don't know anything about how the tests are put together so I'd have to look
into that before suggesting a way to differentiate my system. Having said that
wouldn't the 3.3-RELEASE string be sufficient?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-13 17:33:50 | Re: RC1? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-13 16:58:04 | Re: RC1? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-13 17:33:50 | Re: RC1? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-13 16:58:04 | Re: RC1? |