Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al
Date: 2002-10-19 02:02:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0210191200050.6080-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Anyone see a way out of this catch-22? If not, which is the least
> bad alternative?

Ultimately, fix TRUNCATE to be transaction safe. This is non-trivial,
I know :-).

Regardless, the first option seems the less of the two evils.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2002-10-19 02:07:39 Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-10-19 01:45:50 Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al