| From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert J(dot) Sanford, Jr(dot)" <rsanford(at)trefs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and MySQL in ZDNet article... |
| Date: | 2002-08-19 21:34:23 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0208192229480.1042-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Robert J. Sanford, Jr. wrote:
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,474127,00.asp
I almost hate to be in on one of these my DB is better than yours/effective
marketing threads but...
That reads to me as more of a MySQL article than anything else, except perhaps
a one still has to buy a 'proper' DB if one wants a 'proper' DB. Perhaps one of
the things giving me that view is that while MySQL is sounding like it's coming
on leaps and bounds with a release every 6 months and is adding this and that
functionality all PostgreSQL can come up with is replication because it's
already got the rest.
I bet noone ever thought having functionality someone else didn't would result
in better press for the other.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Linn Kubler | 2002-08-19 22:22:42 | Functions question |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-08-19 21:17:30 | Re: Updating a date field |