Re: [HACKERS] postgresql performance tuning document ?

Again, I'm not sure this doesn't belong on -general but have left the -hackers
in the distribution list so it can be seen there.

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

> I see files truncated at 1Gb on my Linux server:
>
> -rw------- 1 postgres users 855490560 Aug 6 20:53 795261707.2
> -rw------- 1 postgres users 943259648 Aug 8 23:34 823049708
> -rw------- 1 postgres users 1073741824 Aug 6 20:53 795261707.1
> -rw------- 1 postgres users 1073741824 Aug 6 20:53 795261707
>
> I'm wondering if postgresql doesn't have LARGE_FILES support ?

Those look like PostgreSQL's data files (from the context of the email) is that
so? And if so, have you got a requirement for having large data files? It seems
an odd requirement especially as I'd say you have approaching 3GB in one table
so you're not too far off getting to 4GB and can the host system handle such
files?

--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director

---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants