| From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Wim <wdh(at)belbone(dot)be>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: URGENT! pg_dump doesn't work! |
| Date: | 2002-07-22 20:27:55 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0207222122250.2345-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Wim <wdh(at)belbone(dot)be> writes:
> > I have a problem with my postgres 7.2.1 database.
> > I can't perform a pg_dump one my database...
> > The message I get back is:
>
> Odd. I am thinking this might be a corrupted-data problem.
>
> If you are lucky, the corruption is in an index, and you can fix it
> by rebuilding the system indexes. Read the REINDEX reference page
> (carefully, it's a convoluted procedure)
Tom,
That's why I went down the hardware question. Given the error reported by Wim
though seems to be a memory allocation, actually freeing, fault would data
corruption in any persistent storage object be suspect?
I suppose it worth checking that the error persists across a backend
restart. Wim?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-22 20:31:07 | Re: Can I use row-level locks to sequence READ COMMITTED transactions? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-22 20:26:24 | Re: Inheritance and Update/Delete |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patrick Hatcher | 2002-07-22 20:38:30 | Memory problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-22 20:19:16 | Re: URGENT! pg_dump doesn't work! |