From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-05 16:48:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0207051747340.2828-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > >> At some point, we may have to modify our name and start at 1.0 again.
> >
> > > Ya, that's it ... we've only spent, what, 8 years now making 'PostgreSQL'
> > > known, so let's change the name *just* so that we can start at 1.0 and
> > > face a new challenge of getting ppl to recognize the name?
> >
> > I've heard a number of people opine that we should go back to just plain
> > 'Postgres', which is pronounceable by the uninitiate, and besides which
>
> I can never figure this out ... what is so difficult about 'Postgres-Q-L'?
Of course I got it completely round the wrong and thought Postgres was the
latter of the two names. I've got to go change my documents now.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-07-05 16:52:57 | Re: explicit cast error |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-05 16:46:24 | Re: plpgsql: PERFORM SELECT id INTO TEMP TABLE .. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-05 17:20:37 | Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR) |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-07-05 16:43:26 | Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am |