From: | Andrew Perrin <clists(at)perrin(dot)socsci(dot)unc(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Naomi Walker <nwalker(at)eldocomp(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tim Ellis <Tim(dot)Ellis(at)gamet(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: multiple instances on one box? |
Date: | 2002-06-03 21:05:32 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0206031704370.21060-100000@perrin.socsci.unc.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I won't claim to understand that fully, but just would say that I'd be
worried if a postmaster went down -- worried enough that I'd want to have
backup hardware in a mission-critical situation, not just a backup
postmaster instance. What's the theoretical case in which a postmaster
dies or is inaccessible but the same machine could serve the same database
with a different process?
ap
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
clists(at)perrin(dot)socsci(dot)unc(dot)edu * andrew_perrin (at) unc.edu
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Naomi Walker wrote:
> At 12:18 PM 6/3/2002 , Andrew Perrin wrote:
> >What's the reason for doing this? Just use separate databases -- if
> >necessary, with different users given permissions on each -- in the same
> >postmaster instance.
>
> We will be using separate instances for failover purposes in our clustered
> environment.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-03 22:30:14 | Re: configure datatype name > 31? |
Previous Message | Naomi Walker | 2002-06-03 21:00:45 | Re: multiple instances on one box? |