Re: multiple instances on one box?

From: Andrew Perrin <clists(at)perrin(dot)socsci(dot)unc(dot)edu>
To: Naomi Walker <nwalker(at)eldocomp(dot)com>
Cc: Tim Ellis <Tim(dot)Ellis(at)gamet(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multiple instances on one box?
Date: 2002-06-03 21:05:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0206031704370.21060-100000@perrin.socsci.unc.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

I won't claim to understand that fully, but just would say that I'd be
worried if a postmaster went down -- worried enough that I'd want to have
backup hardware in a mission-critical situation, not just a backup
postmaster instance. What's the theoretical case in which a postmaster
dies or is inaccessible but the same machine could serve the same database
with a different process?

ap

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
clists(at)perrin(dot)socsci(dot)unc(dot)edu * andrew_perrin (at) unc.edu

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Naomi Walker wrote:

> At 12:18 PM 6/3/2002 , Andrew Perrin wrote:
> >What's the reason for doing this? Just use separate databases -- if
> >necessary, with different users given permissions on each -- in the same
> >postmaster instance.
>
> We will be using separate instances for failover purposes in our clustered
> environment.
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-06-03 22:30:14 Re: configure datatype name > 31?
Previous Message Naomi Walker 2002-06-03 21:00:45 Re: multiple instances on one box?