Re: Suggestion for optimization

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion for optimization
Date: 2002-04-07 12:27:08
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0204072221460.4673-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Barry Lind wrote:

> Af far as I know Oracle doesn't have any short cut (along the lines of
> what is being discussed in this thread) for this operation. However
> Oracle is more efficient in providing the answer than postgres currently
> is. While postgres needs to perform a full scan on the table, Oracle
> will only need to perform a full index scan on the primary key if one
> exists. Since the index will likely have much less data than the full

Under Postgres, a full index scan is generally more expensive than a full
table scan since indices, particularly btree, carry a large amount of meta
data and theefore consume more pages.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-04-07 12:50:41 Re: Suggestion for optimization
Previous Message Kjartan Бsюуrsson 2002-04-07 11:49:08 Re: Indexing and regular expressions