Re: timeout implementation issues

From: Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Date: 2002-04-05 15:13:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0204051012410.19133-100000@atalanta.dynamicdiagrams.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> It that acceptable to the JDBC folks? It requires two "SET timeout = 0"
> statements, one after the statement in the transaction, and another
> after the transaction COMMIT WORK.

That's fine, though probably about as much work as just implementing the
whole thing in JDBC.

j

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-05 15:18:58 Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-05 15:12:54 Re: Changing column types...