Re: PAM Authentication Patch, take one...

On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> pam_strerror() should be used a few more times, rather than just saying
> "Error!". Also, the configure.in snippet seems wrong. You add
> -I$pam_prefix/include/security to $INCLUDES and then you #include
> <security/pam_appl.h>. This whole thing is probably unnecessary, since
> PAM is a system library on the systems where it exists, so the headers
> and libraries are found automatically, unlike OpenSSL and
> Kerberos.

See attached revised patch. (I'm sure the configure.in stuff can be done
right/better, I'm just not enough of a autoconf guru to know what to
change it to.)

--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/