From: | "Thalis A(dot) Kalfigopoulos" <thalis(at)cs(dot)pitt(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: \df+ and pg_proc query |
Date: | 2001-07-13 14:23:56 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0107131023190.9097-100000@aluminum.cs.pitt.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Richard Huxton wrote:
> From: "Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos" <thalis(at)cs(dot)pitt(dot)edu>
>
> > I assume that there is in fact a difference between doing:
> >
> > \df+ <func_name>
> >
> > and:
> >
> > select oid,proname,prosrc from pg_proc where proname='func_name';
> >
> > because I have a plpgsql function for a trigger, which I can see with the
> second method (the select...) but not with the first method (the \df+ ). Is
> it not possible to have the \df actually show up all functions?
>
> Start psql with -E and then do \df+ to see what query PG actually uses (this
> works for any \command)
I know that, but the question was: how come the \df doesn't show the plpgsql functions? Shouldn't it?
cheers,
thalis
>
> - Richard Huxton
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | wsheldah | 2001-07-13 14:34:20 | RE: Outer joins |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-13 14:22:30 | Re: Outer joins |