| From: | "Thalis A(dot) Kalfigopoulos" <thalis(at)cs(dot)pitt(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Wolfe <steve(at)iboats(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OID's.... |
| Date: | 2001-05-30 20:30:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0105301453400.317-100000@aluminum.cs.pitt.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Steve Wolfe wrote:
>
> I know that this topic comes up fairly often, so I tried to search the
> archives, but the search engine doesn't appear to have info on messages
> after 1999, so forgive me for repeating this topic.
>
> Recently, our OID usage has started to jump dramatically - today, we're
> using ten thousand or more in a few minutes. We're trying to figure out
> just what is using so many, without any luck. Aside from doing a lot of
> inserts (which we don't do many of), what would cause this? Are they
> pre-allocated for transactions and not freed?
>
> Also, when the OID's reach the limit of an int4, if I recall correctly,
> they simply wrap around, and things keep working unless you depend on
> unique OID's. Is that correct?
That's correct.
cheers,
t.
p.s. and rumor has it that the universe will start shrinking as soon as this happens ;-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos | 2001-05-30 20:31:38 | Re: Indexes |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-05-30 20:25:04 | Re: Indexes |