| From: | "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs) |
| Date: | 2001-02-09 03:58:45 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0102082157070.12094-100000@morannon.the-infinite.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) writes:
> > The Linux page says just:
> > HISTORY
> > A syslog function call appeared in BSD 4.2.
> > Normally if there's a standard they mention it.
>
> Yes, the HP man pages also trace it to BSD. I'm surprised syslog
> (apparently) hasn't made it into any formal standard.
"man syslog" shows the above, "man logger" however, shows this:
STANDARDS
The logger command is expected to be IEEE Std1003.2 (``POSIX'') compati-
ble.
--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-09 03:59:22 | Re: case insensitive unique index (part 2) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-09 03:52:34 | Re: Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs) |