From: | "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jarmo Paavilainen <netletter(at)comder(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SV: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |
Date: | 2000-12-29 20:39:18 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0012291434380.5654-100000@morannon.the-infinite.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Jarmo Paavilainen wrote:
> > Just curious, what kind of tables did you set up in MySQL? My
>
> Ehh... there are more than one kind... I did not know. Still with
> transactions on PostgreSQL (unsafe method?) MySQL was 2 times as fast as
> PostgreSQL. I will check this out, and return to this list with the results.
From my findings, there are at least 5 different types of tables in mysql
- DBD (Berkeley DB), HEAP, ISAM, MERGE and MyISAM. (Ned did mention
earlier today/yesterday that they implemented row-level locking with adds
(yet) another table type?). Onlt BDB tables support transactions.
> Its a question of a compromising between speed and "integrity". *I think*
> PostgreSQL should and could lower their "integrity" a bit (15 times slower).
I would rather have the integrity that PostgreSQL has, than the speed that
MySQL claims to have.
--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-12-29 21:08:44 | Re: SV: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |
Previous Message | Dominic J. Eidson | 2000-12-29 20:30:46 | Re: SV: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |