| From: | "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Jarmo Paavilainen <netletter(at)comder(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: SV: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare | 
| Date: | 2000-12-29 20:39:18 | 
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0012291434380.5654-100000@morannon.the-infinite.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Jarmo Paavilainen wrote:
> > Just curious, what kind of tables did you set up in MySQL?  My
> 
> Ehh... there are more than one kind... I did not know. Still with
> transactions on PostgreSQL (unsafe method?) MySQL was 2 times as fast as
> PostgreSQL. I will check this out, and return to this list with the results.
From my findings, there are at least 5 different types of tables in mysql
- DBD (Berkeley DB), HEAP, ISAM, MERGE and MyISAM. (Ned did mention
earlier today/yesterday that they implemented row-level locking with adds
(yet) another table type?). Onlt BDB tables support transactions.
> Its a question of a compromising between speed and "integrity". *I think*
> PostgreSQL should and could lower their "integrity" a bit (15 times slower).
I would rather have the integrity that PostgreSQL has, than the speed that
MySQL claims to have.
-- 
Dominic J. Eidson
                                        "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/              http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-12-29 21:08:44 | Re: SV: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare | 
| Previous Message | Dominic J. Eidson | 2000-12-29 20:30:46 | Re: SV: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |