Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names
Date: 2000-11-17 18:18:04
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011171915300.789-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Are people satisfied with the notion of requiring an info function
> to go with each dynamically loaded new-style function? If so, I'll
> start working on that too.

Sounds good to me.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-17 18:23:13 Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2000-11-17 17:42:01 Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)