From: | Andreas Tille <tillea(at)rki(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | sqllist <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Requests for Development |
Date: | 2000-11-10 07:43:14 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0011100838310.7464-100000@wr-linux02.rki.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 2. Stored Procedure functionality, i.e. outputting a full recordset from
> a function (or new structure, if functions are hard to adapt) based on
> the last SELECT statement passed to the function. An alternative would
> be to develop parameterized views, which might be the easiest path.
I'm not really sure if parameterized views are a real alternative.
They would help in some cases, but *real* stored procedures would be
much more powerful. In my opinion it is also in the sense of easier
porting from databases to PostgreSQL to the benefit od PostgreSQL.
I wonder if there couldn't borrowed some code from Interbase which has
full featured stored procedures - at least it was told to me that it has ...
> 3. Slightly more informative syntax error messages - frankly, just
> grabbing a little more text around the word or punctuation that
> triggered the error would be enormously helpful (I can't tell you the
> number of times I've gotten "Error at or near ')'" in a huge DDL
> statement.
Waht about i18n. Could PostgreSQL sources gettext-ized?
> Thanks so much for your ongoing hard work!
Couldn'trepeated often enough alos for the past!
Kind regards
Andreas.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Igor Roboul | 2000-11-10 09:29:50 | Re: Increasing the number of semaphores on FreeBSD 4.1 (clarification) |
Previous Message | Philip Hallstrom | 2000-11-10 05:01:37 | How to get postmaster to read it's new log file? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gerhard Dieringer | 2000-11-10 08:26:17 | Re: Requests for Development |
Previous Message | Roberto Mello | 2000-11-09 20:40:00 | Re: Requests for Development |