| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: problems with configure |
| Date: | 2000-11-08 22:16:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0011082253390.1138-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Not sure what to do about this. It will clearly not do to define
> ACCEPT_TYPE_ARG3 as void. Perhaps we need a special case for
> Solaris 7: if we detect that accept() is declared with "void *",
> assume that socklen_t is the thing to use. Peter, any thoughts?
Perhaps we could, in case "void *" is discovered, run a similar deal with
bind() or setsockopt(), i.e., some socket function that takes a
non-pointer socklen_t (or whatever), in order to find out the true nature
of what's behind the "void *".
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-08 22:23:01 | Re: Proposal for DROP TABLE rollback mechanism |
| Previous Message | Martin A. Marques | 2000-11-08 21:43:36 | Re: problems with configure |