Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Date: 2000-10-31 09:46:39
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0010302151540.777-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Lamar Owen writes:

> In the environment of the general purpose OS upgrade, the RPM's
> installation scripts cannot fire up a backend, nor can it assume one
> is running or is not running, nor can the RPM installation scripts
> fathom from the run-time environment whether they are being run from a
> command line or from the OS upgrade (except on Linux Mandrake, which
> allows such usage).

I don't understand why this is so. It seems perfectly possible that some
%preremovebeforeupdate starts a postmaster, runs pg_dumpall, saves the
file somewhere, then the %postinstallafterupdate runs the inverse
operation. Disk space is not a valid objection, you'll never get away
without 2x storage. Security is not a problem either. Are you not
upgrading in proper dependency order or what? Everybody does dump,
remove, install, undump; so can the RPMs.

Okay, so it's not as great as a new KDE starting up and asking "may I
update your configuration files?", but understand that the storage format
is optimized for performance, not easy processing by external tools or
something like that.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Tomes 2000-10-31 10:29:13 Re: Postgres not finding tables
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2000-10-31 07:17:50 how to get rid of "NOTICE"'s in psql?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-31 09:51:04 Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-10-31 07:51:59 AW: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christos Poulkas 2000-10-31 14:51:29 Postgres on Windows NT
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-10-30 15:43:14 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)