From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources |
Date: | 2000-10-30 16:55:01 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0010301750260.777-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Larry Rosenman writes:
> Hmm. I wonder why cc and gcc are doing different math. Wierd.
Not only that, but you get different results with the same compiler
depending on different optimization settings. The joys of binary floating
point...
> I suspect it might have to do with what gcc was compiled on (7.0.x of
> UW). Can we make 2 expected files and have the map file figure it
> out?
The resultmap mechanism isn't really prepared for this yet, but it is
doable I'd say.
> As to the timestamp, can we make a note that on timechange sundays
> don't run the regression test? :-)
We've had a note in there since the last change (April was it?), which was
when I ran into this. :-)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2000-10-30 16:55:10 | Re: CC not getting -O passed? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-10-30 16:23:34 | Re: Current CVS broken? |