Re: Style question

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Style question
Date: 2000-10-21 16:58:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0010211852380.825-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman writes:

> We currently have a patch in the doc/FAQ_SCO file for the "accept
> doesn't send AF_UNIX to the caller" problem on SCO UnixWare 7.1.[01].
> Is there any problem with configure finding out we are on one of those
> releases (uname -v), and setting a UW= variable so the user doesn't
> have to remember to patch their sources?

I think we should install this patch conditional on some __UnixWare__
#define, if there's a good one. If there isn't, then we can add our own
#define ACCEPT_IS_BUSTED_IN_PECULIAR_WAYS in src/include/port/unixware.h.

Testing runtime behaviour in configure is not good "style". :)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2000-10-21 17:04:22 Re: UnixWare 7.1.1b FS
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-21 16:49:22 Re: UnixWare 7.1.1b FS