Re: Delimited identifier length

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Delimited identifier length
Date: 2000-10-04 01:00:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0010040250350.1057-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Next question is do we want to change it? I can't imagine any real good
> use for a null-string name, but is there any risk of breaking existing
> applications?

I think the larger risk is breaking applications if we leave it this way.
One such broken application is the format_type function and thus pg_dump.
That can be fixed of course, but there might be more programs that use a
similar simple-minded mechanism to check whether quoting is needed.

Also, an empty identifier might be more likely to be a client program bug
than really intended, especially in languages that handle variables
loosely.

OTOH, I'd suggest that we do not enforce the 128 maximum length mandated
by SQL. :-)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashley Cambrell 2000-10-04 01:22:58 Version data type.
Previous Message elein 2000-10-04 00:47:55 FW: oracle ate