Re: loss of portability in ecpg

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: loss of portability in ecpg
Date: 2000-09-20 17:46:28
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0009201946080.362-100000@peter
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
> "long long int". They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
> of having strtoull() in libc. I think some autoconf work is needed
> here.

Will look.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2000-09-20 18:06:16 Re: Solution for RI permission problem
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-09-20 17:45:49 Re: Timezone discrepancies