From: | Andreas Tille <tillea(at)rki(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com> |
Cc: | user Postgresql ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.1 Release Date |
Date: | 2000-09-06 14:49:48 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0009061642590.19267-100000@wr-linux02.rki.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> Having done both Redhat and debian installs, I have to say I'm much more
> fond of Redhat's process. In a work environment, you need to be able to
> put the CD in the server that sits in the server room, then walk away. A
> redhat install takes half an hour. When I did a debian install at home
> it took days, mostly because the machine kept waiting for me to answer
> some silly little question. Redhat has it's pitfalls as well -- overall
> I'm pretty neutral over which I prefer, but there are important virtues
> to Redhat's strategy.
To be exact: The *old* Debian strategy. Debconf in Potato (2.2) does
a great job and will be even better in the future. There exist's also
an project called FAI, which enables fully automatical install.
No intention to start a distribution flamewar, just to serve some
facts, which I have to while being a Debian maintainer ;-).
Just use your favourite distribution and have fun with the nice
PostgreSQL server.
Kind regards
Andreas.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cristian D. GAL | 2000-09-06 14:54:55 | Question |
Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-09-06 14:44:32 | Re: Large selects handled inefficiently? |