Re: Templates

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Templates
Date: 2000-07-12 00:24:26
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0007120153260.350-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Say what? The variants we've been having trouble with *are*
> config.guess outputs. Moreover there are new versions of config.guess
> all the time. You're making no sense at all here.

Wait, didn't you say the problem was from vendors changing their uname
output? We know what config.guess can print, it's in the source. When new
versions come out we can read the ChangeLog. The Alpha problem you
mentioned could have been solved by writing "alpha.*" instead of just
"alpha". I don't believe relying on uname would have made this better.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Perdue 2000-07-12 00:35:52 Serious Performance Loss in 7.0.2??
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-12 00:24:07 How to handle documentation installation