Re: boolean isn't boolean?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Marc Britten <mbritten(at)cybernet-usa(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: boolean isn't boolean?
Date: 2000-06-24 11:56:02
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006231926520.484-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thomas Lockhart writes:

> Do you have a reference for an SQL99 document? Preferably on-line or in
> a form similar to what we've found for SQL3-1999?

ftp://jerry.ece.umassd.edu/isowg3/x3h2/Standards/ansi-iso-9075-[12345]-1999.txt

This seems to be the real copyrighted deal, so get yours while it's there.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-24 11:56:35 RE: boolean isn't boolean?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-24 02:48:53 Re: Is this still true?