Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-14 16:36:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006141834460.350-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane writes:

> Also note the complaints we've been getting about CREATE USER not
> working inside a transaction block. That is a case where someone
> (Peter IIRC) took the more hard-line approach of emitting an error
> instead of a warning. I think it was not the right choice to make.

Probably. Remember that you can claim your lunch any time. :)

In all truth, the problem is that the ODBC driver isn't very flexible
about putting BEGIN/END blocks around things. Perhaps that is also
something to look at.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-06-14 16:53:48 Re: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.1 documentation
Previous Message Arrigo Triulzi 2000-06-14 16:34:24 New alpha spinlock code passes regression test

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Haberlach 2000-06-14 18:12:46 Re: BeOS and IPC - try 999
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-14 16:35:44 Re: BeOS and IPC - try 999