Re: ODBC configure

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: byron(dot)nikolaidis(at)home(dot)com
Subject: Re: ODBC configure
Date: 2000-06-06 16:08:16
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006060558350.3694-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:

> I don't have a problem with ODBC having it's own configure script, if
> that's what's desired, but then it needs to be used unconditionally.
> Running the standalone and the integrated show at the same time doesn't
> work.

Further investigation shows that the standalone build is completely broken
and apparently no longer maintained. Thus, is there any point in trying to
keep it?

> (Incidentally, I think the ODBC thing is simple enough to just use
> Automake on it and be done with it. Then we don't need any templates or
> port makefiles or whatever.)

FWIW, I just did tried that conversion and it's really very nice (after
fixing some of shared-lib-on-linux-only funny business). So in case you
wanna keep the separate build after all...

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-06 16:09:00 Re: AW: New warning code for missing FROM relations
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-06 16:08:04 Re: AW: New warning code for missing FROM relations