Re: Problems with recent CVS versions and Solaris.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with recent CVS versions and Solaris.
Date: 2000-06-02 23:47:12
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006020409220.372-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Ugh. I think that the former version of the script didn't use
> conditional expressions (a ? b : c). Perhaps old versions of
> awk don't have those? If so we can probably work around it...

While you're at it, you should use AC_PROG_AWK to potentially find the
most modern and fastest awk on the system. Also, it seems that script has
really little to no checking of exit statuses. A segfault during initdb is
a really obscure place to find out about awk syntax errors.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-02 23:47:30 Re: pg_am.amowner
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2000-06-02 22:31:37 Re: Inet type how to?