pg_am.amowner

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_am.amowner
Date: 2000-05-31 23:51:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006010142210.701-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It seems that access methods nominally have an "owner", but that owner is
nowhere else referenced. Since there is no user interface for adding
access methods anyway, would there be any problems with removing that
field?

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-01 00:01:50 Re: pg_am.amowner
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-31 23:28:54 Re: uniqueness not always correct