Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime
Date: 2000-03-05 13:39:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0003051436470.347-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii writes:

> Shouldn't we use timestamp instead of AbsoluteTime in
> TransactionStateData? It also gives more precision.

Thomas was hesitant to using 8 byte types internally across the board. He
must have his reasons.

I think that eventually *all* time'ish stuff should be moved to the new
stuff but perhaps we should wait until the current datetime-related panic
has died down. :)

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-03-05 14:15:45 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-03-05 13:36:22 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block