Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance
Date: 2000-02-20 02:37:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0002200336560.474-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2000-02-19, Tom Lane mentioned:

> > * INSERT INTO table DEFAULT VALUES [13.8]
> > {Looks like a grammar fix as well.}
>
> Huh? We do have DEFAULT VALUES --- what is wrong exactly?

Not documented. ;)

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-02-20 04:15:54 Re: [HACKERS] new backslah command of psql
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-20 02:34:38 Re: [HACKERS] new backslah command of psql