Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments
Date: 2000-02-10 20:06:06
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0002102104240.1014-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2000-02-10, Thomas Lockhart mentioned:

> > > createdb has lost its ability to supply a default database name...
> > What was supposed to be the default argument?
>
> Ah! Same as for psql: the account name on the process running it (ie
> the user's name).

This is fixed now, but I don't suppose you want dropdb's default behaviour
to be along those same lines. I'd have a serious problem with that, even
though old destroydb used to do that.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-10 20:13:42 psql options
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-10 18:34:48 Re: [HACKERS] make_ctags script