Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags
Date: 2000-02-07 19:50:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0002062354290.13872-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2000-02-06, Don Baccus mentioned:

> At 02:07 PM 2/6/00 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> >The suggestion I have is to offer the traditional behaviour with a single
> >-e flag, so there's little change for anyone switching from <7.0, and the
> >"full" echo mode with two -e flags. I'd then change the flags in the
> >regression drivers to -e -e. Comments? Better ideas?
>
> "-E"? Or another flag? I think "-e -e" is a real kludge. If I

You're ignoring that -E is already used. It would be my first choice as
well, but it's a compatibility break. How about -a ("all")?

> thought the full-echo mode were only useful for regression tests I wouldn't
> care, but I like the idea of a full echo and I'm sure others do, too, so
> I'd rather see it be receive full flag citizenship rather than the double
> "-e" bit.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-07 19:53:35 Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-07 19:49:56 Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags