From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "J(dot) Roeleveld" <j(dot)roeleveld(at)softhome(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] System requirements |
Date: | 2000-01-24 23:49:25 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0001242119070.525-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
This depends entirely(?) on what kinds of tables you use, especially their
size, and what kind of queries you want to do with it. 128MB RAM should be
fine for average applications, the hard disk size pretty much just limits
how much data you can store (and sort), and the processor factor is hard
to gauge. Having two processors might help more than anything else. But in
general it's for you to find out.
On 2000-01-24, J. Roeleveld mentioned:
> Hi,
>
> I've been checking the archives and documentation for what the
> system requirements are for a PostgreSQL database....
>
> It's to be used for a database with 8 users, and has MS-Access front-end
> which causes app. 2 connections per user.
>
> My idea was:
>
> 128Meg Ram
> 20 Gig HD
> 500 Mhz. Celeron
>
> will this be sufficient, or will it have be something else?
>
> Also what is required more, memory or CPU-power?
>
> hoping for an answer,
>
> Joost Roeleveld
>
>
> ************
>
>
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-24 23:49:34 | Re: your mail |
Previous Message | John Henderson | 2000-01-24 23:34:14 | is this a bug? |