| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 |
| Date: | 2000-01-22 14:24:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0001202307410.349-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2000-01-20, Bruce Momjian mentioned:
> > Are we going to yank DISTINCT ON?
>
> I don't show DISTINCT ON as being worked on by anyone.
I think Tom mentioned several times that he would like to yank it because
a) it's non-standard
b) it's conceptually flawed
c) there's a standard alternative
d) it doesn't work too well
e) people keep trying to use it
Just making sure no one forgets ...
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-22 16:09:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Types |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-01-22 14:24:05 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris |