Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
Date: 2000-01-19 20:11:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0001192044260.5544-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2000-01-18, Bruce Momjian mentioned:

> Can you run our keywords.c using our method and gperf and see if there
> is any speed difference?

It seems to have a speed advantage of about 2.5. But in practice that
means that 1 million words take half a second. It's not a big deal to me,
I was just wondering before I throw it out. I guess it really only makes a
difference for compilers, which operate on 1000+ lines.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-19 20:12:25 Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2000-01-19 19:24:54 pg_dump disaster