| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Gunther Schadow <gunther(at)aurora(dot)rg(dot)iupui(dot)edu>, "hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY |
| Date: | 1999-12-14 23:01:52 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.20.9912142100270.388-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1999-12-14, Thomas Lockhart mentioned:
> afaik we support the type names defined in SQL92 (like smallint),
> historical names in Postgres, and some extensions. What more do we
> need?
We need to move the standard names up in the docs and the historical ones
down. I guess what you're doing with the date/time types would also be a
good idea.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew Hagerty | 1999-12-14 23:11:50 | Backend core dump, different server! |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-12-14 23:01:39 | Re: [PATCHES] createdb/dropdb fixes |