From: | Bhuvan A <bhuvansql(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sequencing Problem in Transaction.. |
Date: | 2002-02-12 13:40:10 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.20.0202121909070.7267-100000@Larry.bks |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Feb 12, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Ummm...this is not a bug - it is utterly essential that sequences are not
> rolled back!!!
>
> Think about this:
>
> Sequence counter is 9
> Transaction 1 gets sequence no. 10
> Transaction 2 gets sequence no. 11
> transaction 1 rolls back, sequence no. reset to 9
> Transaction 3 gets sequence number 10
> Transaction 4 gets sequence number 11 - BAM!!!
>
Good and Thankx!!!
Regards,
Bhuvaneswar.
> Chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bhuvan A
> > Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2002 1:26 PM
> > To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: [SQL] Sequencing Problem in Transaction..
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > In postgresql 7.1, there is a problem in sequence.
> >
> > While rollbacking in transaction mode, the sequences are not actually
> > getting rolled back. This problem is still there in 7.2, it seems!
> >
> > When they planned to fix this? Any idea?
> >
> > With Regards,
> > Bhuvaneswaran.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Max Reymond | 2002-02-12 15:45:55 | SQL request to retrieve the type of columns |
Previous Message | Unnikrishnan Menon | 2002-02-12 06:56:06 | Re: Oracle "Jobs" in PostgreSQL |