Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha

From: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha
Date: 1999-11-10 01:04:24
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.9911091859400.283-100000@excelsior.rkirkpat.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Without these patches, pgsql will not run out of the box on
> > Linux/Alpha. Hopefully it will in 7.0 a few (?) months from now.
>
> Why don't we apply this to 6.5.*.

Not to sound annoyed here (long, long day), but we have been down
this path before. The general consensus (sp?) was that parts were to
radical (for 6.5.* maint. releases) and had a tendency to break other
platforms. A quick test showed that they broke Linux/Intel to some extent.
:(
Yea, I know I could clean them up with #define __alpha__ type fun,
and I plan to do so, probably for the 6.6 release (what I really meant to
say above). It is just right now busy is an understatement for my life.
For some reason, my professors see design projects as more important than
hacking Postgres. :(

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain." |
| --- Philippians 1:21 (KJV) |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Ryan Kirkpatrick | Boulder, Colorado | http://www.rkirkpat.net/ |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-10 01:04:43 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-10 00:55:14 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Linux Alpha