Re: AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1
Date: 1999-10-06 16:34:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.9910061831100.1744-100000@peter-e.yi.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 6, Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 mentioned:

> > * when \connect fails, it now keeps the previous connection (formerly
> > aborted program)
>
> This was the behavior at one time, but it was regarded as very dangerous
> and thus changed to the current behavior.
>
> The problem was, that scripts would do things to the wrong database if a
> connect failed.

See earlier response. Only in interactive mode. The idea was that a typo
should not bomb you out of the program.

> The ultimate solution would be an unconnected state, where only
> \connect or help commands would be accepted.

I had that idea, too, but that would open a whole new can of worms
code-wise. Can you guys out there comment if this feature would be
desirable?

--
Peter Eisentraut - peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-06 18:17:20 Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-10-06 16:29:09 Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1