Re: Confusing terminology

From: "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)tincan(dot)org>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusing terminology
Date: 2002-01-18 23:54:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10201181552430.29894-100000@tincan.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Mike Mascari wrote:

> What about "relation" vs. "table"?
>
> CREATE TABLE foo(key integer);
>
> ERROR: Relation 'foo' already exists

Can a table named foo and a view named foo exist in the same database?

Cheers,
Rod
--
Let Accuracy Triumph Over Victory

Zetetic Institute
"David's Sling"
Marc Stiegler

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arguile 2002-01-18 23:57:08 Re: Confusing terminology
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-01-18 23:02:23 Re: UPDATE Query problem