From: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)tincan(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Poul Laust Christiansen <poulc(at)cs(dot)auc(dot)dk>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) |
Date: | 2001-01-23 20:57:09 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10101231251200.10395-100000@tincan.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In general, RPMs only work on systems that are the same as the one they
> were built on, for various degrees of "same". If you're not picking up
> the RPMs from your distributor or you're sure that the builder used the
> same version as you have, it's always prudent to rebuild from the source
> RPM. That should work, unless the package spec makes some unportable
> assumptions, such as different file system layouts. But that is often
> only an annoyance, not a real problem.
While trying to get the FrontPage Extensions installed on a RedHat/Apache
system I ran into to different version numbering systems between RedHat
and Mandrake. Major pain. One called for perl 5.6.0-xxx and the other
perl 5.60-xxx. After several hours of screwing around with it I took a
break. Fortunately before I spent any more time on it the client I was
going to do it for decided to not run them with Apache.
I'm glad to see GreatBridge will be providing RPM's for many
distributions. Though I do tend to re-compile from source I've found that
those mdk's don't work too good with RHL.
Rod
--
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-01-23 21:10:34 | RE: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-23 20:44:30 | Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases |