From: | <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | jan(dot)bajerski(at)viterra(dot)pl |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2000-10-23 18:09:08 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10010231405460.3868-100000@chapelperilous.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 jan(dot)bajerski(at)viterra(dot)pl wrote:
> I have following problem with PostgreSQL 6.5.3, I haven't possiblity
> to check it on 7.0 and I want to know is it possible to run such query:
>
> SELECT k.pic, id_g, id_k, count(*)
^^^^ ^^^^
What table do these come from?
> FROM kart k, pictues p
^^^^^^^^
This looks like a typo
> WHERE k.pic = p.pic
> GROUP BY k.pic
>
> PICTURES(pic,id_g,id_k)
> KART (pic,email,mess,date)
>
> I've got answer from Postgres
> "Illegal attributes or non-group column"
>
> Is it error in query or in parser ?
Probably the query.
Brett W. McCoy
http://www.chapelperilous.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The goys have proven the following theorem...
-- Physicist John von Neumann, at the start of a classroom
lecture.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2000-10-23 18:22:28 | Re: foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ? |
Previous Message | najm Hashmi | 2000-10-23 17:25:45 | Need info: pl/pgsql performance |